×
Follow Us
Results 1 to 5 of 5

IEEE vs NETA

 Jump to latest post
    #1
  1. Donalddc is offline Junior Member Pro Subscriber
    Join Date
    May 2021
    Posts
    7
    Reputation

    IEEE vs NETA

    All, this is my first post as I am new to Test Guy. Well, not actually new but just getting involved in the forums. I have been researching PI and DAR criteria. The NETA MTS/ATS says that anything greater than 1 is good, but as I have researched I found a posted quote from IEEE and this table attached. Also, a lot of people have said that under 1.5 is a serious condition. What are your thoughts?

    The table below shows the minimum IEEE 43-2013 PI ratings.

    DAR PI Insulation Condition
    <1.25 1.0-2.0 Questionable
    1.25-1.6 2.0-4.0 Good
    >1.6 >4.0 Excellent

    The table is not showing correctly when I post, so the first set of numbers is DAR, the second PI and the third the condition.

  2. #2
  3. nwilliams is offline Junior Member Pro Subscriber
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    13
    Reputation
    Quote Originally Posted by Donalddc View Post
    All, this is my first post as I am new to Test Guy. Well, not actually new but just getting involved in the forums. I have been researching PI and DAR criteria. The NETA MTS/ATS says that anything greater than 1 is good, but as I have researched I found a posted quote from IEEE and this table attached. Also, a lot of people have said that under 1.5 is a serious condition. What are your thoughts?

    The table below shows the minimum IEEE 43-2013 PI ratings.

    DAR PI Insulation Condition
    <1.25 1.0-2.0 Questionable
    1.25-1.6 2.0-4.0 Good
    >1.6 >4.0 Excellent

    The table is not showing correctly when I post, so the first set of numbers is DAR, the second PI and the third the condition.


    NETA-ATS says greater than 1.0 is good for Polarization Index for components like transformers. NETA-ATS also says must be greater than 2.0 for components like motors or generators. For DAR, NETA says 1.0 for DAR on transformers and 1.4 on DAR for motors. For motors, it looks like the IEEE table is fairly consistent with NETA standards. Does IEEE 43 state what components the table is for? I'm not seeing that table in my copy of IEEE 43-2013

  4. #3
  5. Donalddc is offline Junior Member Pro Subscriber
    Join Date
    May 2021
    Posts
    7
    Reputation
    Quote Originally Posted by nwilliams View Post
    NETA-ATS says greater than 1.0 is good for Polarization Index for components like transformers. NETA-ATS also says must be greater than 2.0 for components like motors or generators. For DAR, NETA says 1.0 for DAR on transformers and 1.4 on DAR for motors. For motors, it looks like the IEEE table is fairly consistent with NETA standards. Does IEEE 43 state what components the table is for? I'm not seeing that table in my copy of IEEE 43-2013


    Thank you for the reply. As I looked deeper into it I found that you are correct. There is a difference between the transformers and motors. That cleared it up!

  6. #4
  7. Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    14
    Reputation

    PI

    Quote Originally Posted by nwilliams View Post
    NETA-ATS says greater than 1.0 is good for Polarization Index for components like transformers. NETA-ATS also says must be greater than 2.0 for components like motors or generators. For DAR, NETA says 1.0 for DAR on transformers and 1.4 on DAR for motors. For motors, it looks like the IEEE table is fairly consistent with NETA standards. Does IEEE 43 state what components the table is for? I'm not seeing that table in my copy of IEEE 43-2013

  8. #5
  9. Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    14
    Reputation

    PI

    A polariation index is valid, and a great test, for solid dielectric insulation. According to Megger/ Biddle who is the expert on DC insulation testing the PI is not valid on oil filled equipment. One NETA testing company failed a 138 kV transfromer due to a low PI. Overall power factor, TTR, exciting current, DGA, leakage reactance and SFRA were all acceptable. All tests compared to past tests.

    From the Megger manual:

    It is also interesting to note that many people have tried to use the PI test on oil-filled transformers and
    cannot understand why a known good transformer gives them results close to 1. The answer is simple. PI
    testing is not appropriate for oil-filled transformers. The concept depends on the relatively rigid structures of
    solid insulating materials, where absorption energy is required to reconfigure the electronic structure of
    comparatively fixed molecules against the applied voltage field. Because this process can go to a
    theoretical state of completion (at “infinite time,” which obviously cannot be achieved in the practical
    field, but can be reasonably approximated), the result is a steady diminution of current as molecules reach their
    “final” alignment. Because the PI test is defined by this phenomenon, it cannot be successfully applied to fluid
    materials since the passage of test current through an oil-filled sample creates convection currents that
    continually swirl the oil, resulting in a chaotic lack of structure that opposes the basic premise upon which the PI test rests.

Subscribe

Share this thread

Related Topics

  1. Field Testing of Motors, IEEE 43
    By SecondGen in forum NETA Level 3 Exam
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: December 24, 2021, 03:47 PM
  2. IEEE 1584 circuits less than 240V
    By bec51392 in forum NETA Level 4 Exam
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: October 20, 2021, 09:01 AM
  3. ANSI/IEEE Device Numbers on NETA II Exam
    By Bob_Woodward in forum NETA Level 2 Exam
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: August 21, 2019, 10:07 AM
  4. IEEE Questions
    By MartyCoyne in forum NETA Level 4 Exam
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: May 22, 2018, 01:08 PM
  5. What IEEE level cable terminations should be used?
    By kenner14 in forum NETA Level 4 Exam
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: October 6, 2017, 03:57 PM

Tags for this Thread

Follow us


Explore TestGuy


NETA Certification Training


NICET Electrical Power Testing


Help and Support




You are viewing the archives. Enjoy new features and join the conversation at wiki.testguy.net